Flying to a far-flung destination does not have to cost an extortionate amount of cash, according to one expert.
Flying to a destination on the other side of the world does not have to break the bank, if one expert's comments are anything to go by.
Gareth Williams, chief executive officer at Skyscanner, explained that booking shorter flights in succession could be one way to save money.
He added that this practice can "significantly reduce the cost" and if transfers are arranged for the same day, it could add just a few hours onto the overall travelling time.
The expert explained that arranging excursions outside of peak periods like school holidays is an additional way to cut costs, but skimping on travel insurance would not be recommended - tourists should find the best policy for their needs before leaving the UK.
However, some families may want to make a break out of the voyage itself by booking a stopover at a mid-way location. Mr Williams pointed out that this can "be a great way to take the pain out of a longer journey and allow travellers to enjoy another city along the way".
His comments come in response to research from Skyscanner, which revealed that six out of ten respondents felt happier after a holiday that took them further from home than usual.
Locations like Canada, South Africa and Australia were cited as those that make British tourists feel the happiest, according to the study.
Mr Williams concluded that crossing time zones when going abroad is "more novel and seen as more of a treat", particularly when compared to a short trip to popular destinations in Europe.
By Anne Jones
Article content provided by Adfero Ltd - click
here for details
Most Recent Travel Insurance News Headlines:
